past eighteen months, few seem to have taken the full measure of a
situation which could prove highly uncomfortable, would the economies deteriorate again, as
ammunitions are now extremely scarce. In any event, in the meantime those costs will have to
be borne by the governments, which in other words can be translated as the taxpayer.
Taxpayers being consumers, if the formers see their disposable income eaten up by new levies,
the secondary effect is not very difficult to forecast. As this has been said but should not be
forgotten in the months to come.
It is not the first time that we, and many others in the investment world have drawn attention to
the unusual situation of having extremely low interest rates. In a situation where many assets
yield close to nothing, that’s to say too little to prove making real economic sense, the temptation
is high for looking for other, riskier assets.
Cash offers no return ? what about bonds ? In reality, Government bonds offer little more and as
rates are so low, the capital risk has turned far less attractive. If we continue our (non) random
walk: corporate bonds, do they make more sense? Actually, yes they do, but one of the features
that made them attractive has all but disappeared: spreads, which measure the remuneration of
credit risk have returned to a very normal level. One can hope for a little extra tightening, but
then… don’t hold your breath and remember that if, at the same time, rates start edging back up:
we risk seeing one pocket getting filled while the other gets emptied… It is true that a little extra
carry for some time makes sense.
Finally, there is what is called “high yield”, a nice wording to say “high risk”. We definitely see
some opportunities there but, beware, many are looking at the same - limited - segment, it will
take sharp knowledge of this asset class to swim up that stream. We have actually decreased
the exposure to this highly successful (in 2009) sector. Whatever exposure may be taken
should remain contained to funds where managers can display longstanding experience.
What is said of high yield bonds is pretty similar to what can be said of equities; actually, the
risks are not that different. Equities may seem the right place to be and they have been over the
past 9 months of 2009. Nevertheless, here again, caution should prevail because there is less
than meets the eye: spare capacities are the norm, top line growth might recover a little but what
is said above about consumption will put a cap on that hope. Where potential remains is either
on the cost control side, allowing for some nice surprises here and there at EBITDA level, or on
the corporate activity where the stronger corporates will be tempted to acquire a top line that
cannot be obtained organically.
Those who have in mind our year-ahead analysis know we draw very different perspectives for the developing world, with nuances of course. Nevertheless, when developed stock markets
suffer, so do those of developing countries.
As explained since end November, we see little potential for returns this coming year. Asset
allocation will be key and selectivity even more. Returns will be found in markets where local
expertise is required, where peculiar knowledge is paramount and we see little other ways to do
so than delegating this task to the right specialists. This is why, more than ever, we advocate for
investing via specialized funds.
So we are left with this recurring, nagging wonder of where to invest. We have mentioned our
interest for real assets, amongst which real estate, probably outside the US, can offer value.
Commodities also have their pros.
Opportunities and how to seize them:
Overall - The level of rates, credit spreads and even Equity markets leave little room for real
untapped potential. Overall, we maintain existing exposure but have started moving towards
better credit ratings in spite of the low yields, in a protective move. Regarding Equities, a
move following a similar philosophy is taken: we remain slightly overweight but decrease at
the same time the volatility of positions by choosing defensives and value stocks or Equity
funds. Currencies offer more risk than potential, we suggest limiting exposure to non-home
currencies. Exposure is maintained on Industrial Metals and Agricultural commodities. In this
year, asset preservation will be key and we shift even further towards managed funds.
● Rates and Credit: As it has been for several months, our view is that capital appreciation
(based on either rates movements or spreads tightening) has limited potential else than a
small extra carry and that the risk-reward offered by lower credits is substantially less
than it was last year. We delegate specific picking to funds, keeping some small bias
towrds corporate, emerging and higher yielding vehicles.
● On the currencies front our view is clearly unchanged: the EUR and the USD are weak
currencies versus others, particularly those of developing countries with a strong budget
and natural resources. We avoid currency exposure in portfolios with the exception of
marginal exposure to developing world currencies.
● In the Equity markets, we are not changing our view which is to maintain exposure but
constrained in the less volatile stocks , concentrating on visibility of earnings. Preference
for value oriented strategies and funds with outstanding histories. Exposure to Emerging
countries is to be regained in corrrections and actively trimmed in stronger periods
● We maintain exposure to liquid non-directional funds such as quantitative/statistical funds
as a buffer for directional exposure taken in other asset classes.
● In the Real Estate segment some value can be found, however, markets will be very
differeciated and very local
● Our Key Words remain Tradability, Simplicity, Diversification and Reactivity. In nontrending
markets, investment funds will perform better.
http://www.espiritosanto.com
 |